RCEP, nothing quiet on the Eastern Front

Analysis

On November 15, in Hanoi, under the Vietnamese presidency of ASEAN and on the sidelines of the 37th ASEAN summit, the 10 member states of the Association signed the RCEP (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership) with China, Japan, Korea, New Zealand and Australia.

The agreement, defined by many as historic, crowns negotiations lasting over eight years and is perhaps more a success of the patient (and, on these issues, consensual) diplomacy of ASEAN than that of the Chinese leadership in the area.

A reassuring affirmation of multilateralism in an era of sovereignism and “my country first”? A success of the opening of markets as a response to a return to protectionist fascinations propitiated by the dramatic explosion, first, and difficult management, then, of the COVID 19 pandemic?

There are those who, supporting the thesis of a desirable return to multilateral instruments in response to the destructive fragmentation of the global system that has characterized the last four years and brought to extremes by the global pandemic, underline the ideal connection between the Jeju Forum for Peace and Prosperity held in Korea (Nov. 5-7), the Paris Peace Forum (Nov. 11-13) and the closure of the RCEP. Certainly, the agreement shows that the new regionalism maintains its dynamism even in a historical moment in which protectionism would seem to be the only alternative to multilateralism in crisis.

However, beyond the symbolic and formal aspects, there is the political and economic substance.

From a political point of view, it is clear that the agreement represents a positive result for the entire region. It is, in fact, the first Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between China, Japan and Korea, which are respectively the first, second and third Asian economy. China, then, finds itself in an advantageous position in the Indo-Pacific, thanks to the size of its economy and the defections of India – worried by Chinese industrial competition – and the USA – which left the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP[1]) due to the Trump administration’s fear of a massive outpouring of American investments towards those latitudes. If the benefits descending from the RCEP are manifold for Beijing and lead to believe that the idea that China can be isolated in a global economic context has definitively disappeared, the agreement is, however, the cornerstone of an Asian bloc that already has its place in the framework of global economic and trade relations.

In economic terms, the numbers speak for themselves: the 15 members of the RCEP represent 29% of the world’s GDP, 30% of the global population and 2.2 billion consumers. Not surprisingly, the agreement is expected to lead to an increase in world income of $209 billion per year and global trade of $500 billion over the next decade. Not only; although a certain lack of ambition is undeniable – the reduction of duties is gradual and does not exceed 95%, it intervenes on tariff lines already largely liberalized; there are no forecasts on environmental or social aspects and also those on non-tariff barriers, intellectual property, customs harmonization, technical standards are not particularly advanced -, the agreement marks a significant progress in the field of rules of origin. It establishes, in fact, the equivalence of production and processing carried out in any signatory country for the purposes of intra-bloc trade. Hence, the growing incentive to integrate regional value chains and the consequent acceleration of the process of localization of production activities in ASEAN countries (so-called China+1 Strategy), which is dear to Japanese and Korean (and Chinese) companies and will benefit many regional players, starting with Vietnam.

Mention should also be made of the chapter dedicated to e-commerce, which carefully addresses the issues of expanding access to that market by promoting a significant expansion of this type of transactions and digital industries in the area. This is also in view of the fact that many of the world’s leading operators in the sector are based in the signatory countries: from the Chinese Wechat and Alipay, to the Japanese Line, Korean Kakao Talk, Indonesian Gojeck and Singaporean Grab.

It is difficult, therefore, to reduce the RCEP, in spite of its limitations, to a Chinese neo-colonialist tool towards its own “backyard”. And in the absence of what could have been a major U.S. Marshall Plan for the region to guarantee higher standards in both infrastructure and values, it is undeniable that the agreement will foster growth and integration in the region.

What does this mean for the Italian national interest?

In this context, the Italian national interest can only be considered in close connection with that of the entire EU, since international trade is one of the exclusive competences of Brussels.

The European interest in not “enduring” a similar regional development is concrete, as demonstrated by the conclusion, last December, of the EU-ASEAN Association Agreement. This is a fortiori true if, as some assume, the new U.S. administration will try to strengthen security ties with Southeast Asia and return to engage in regional forums (with an eye to the South China Sea), but will hardly be able to reverse the decline of U.S. influence in the region. An accession of Washington to the regional FTAs is, in fact, now hardly conceivable in light of the numbers in the Senate and the general climate in the country on these issues.

Brussels therefore cannot afford to “stand by and watch”. On the other hand, the EU is present in the RCEP area: it sells goods there for about € 500 billion and there are millions of direct and indirect employees of large European groups operating in the region. In addition, beyond the economic data strictu sensu, there is also an objective interest of the Union to support solutions similar to the RCEP. All this without, however, avoiding the need to recognize that the agreement’s framework is less advanced on social and human rights issues than the most recent trade agreements concluded by the EU with Vietnam and Japan, which are defined as “new generation” because they are “deep and comprehensive”.

From these considerations, the implications for Italy, which is also linked by an association agreement with ASEAN concluded last October, are evident. If the Authorities of the 15 stakeholders act in accordance with the commitment just made, initiating rapid ratification processes and ensuring an increasingly transparent and informed business environment for the benefit of European and Italian companies, our country will benefit from the provisions contained in the agreement. Many of our value chains look to the East, and greater regional integration on that chessboard can be highly advantageous for us not only from a “China+1” perspective but also in terms of increased competitiveness.

[1] After the U.S. exited the TPP, the agreement evolved into the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and has Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, and Vietnam as signatories

Ultime notizie
Istruzione

La conoscenza è il più grande fattore moltiplicatore di sviluppo e di salvaguardia della democrazia. La riflessione di Antonio Uricchio, Presidente dell’Anvur

Il sistema educativo deve interpretare i cambiamenti e dare risposte Molto spesso vengono individuati gli asset i driver dello sviluppo e si tende...
di Antonio Uricchio
zes unica
Infrastrutture

La Zes Unica ha senso solo con una rete infrastrutturale a supporto. L’intervento di Marco Rettighieri, Presidente di Webuild Italia

Parlare di Zes Unica del Mediterraneo ha senso solo se si affronta il discorso delle reti infrastrutturali italiane, ad oggi carenti nello smerciare i container in arrivo nei porti, che tardano anche 15 giorni prima di arrivare a destinazione. La riflessione di Marco Rettighieri.
di MARCO RETTIGHIERI*
zes unica
mediterraneo
Italia

Zes Unica del Mediterraneo, rivalutare il potere del mare

Con la Zes Unica del Mediterraneo l’Italia deve aspirare al recupero di un maggior peso e centralità nell’area, che da troppo tempo è fuori dall’agenda politica nazionale. Il Mediterraneo deve diventare un obiettivo principale, in grado di superare anche la questione del Mezzogiorno.
di Salvatore Napolitano*
mediterraneo
dop
Made in Italy

DOP Economy 4.0, la tecnologia al servizio della tracciabilità

Il mercato delle IG vale in Europa 74,8 miliardi di euro, e un prodotto IG su quattro è italiano. Per valorizzare questa ricchezza bisogna puntare su un futuro tecnologico per i marchi DOP e IG, prodotti di punta del Made in Italy, e a una Agricoltura 4.0 basata su trasparenza e tracciabilità.
di chiara bartoli
dop
caselli
Recensioni

La storia d’Italia in dieci date nel libro-memoir di Gian Carlo Caselli

Gian Carlo Caselli, uno dei Pm più in vista della storia recente d’Italia, racconta il nostro Paese nel libro-memoire “Giorni memorabili che hanno cambiato l'Italia” attraverso le inchieste che lo hanno visto coinvolto da protagonista, dieci date per dieci snodi giudiziari che hanno segnato gli eventi degli ultimi decenni.
di cecilia sgherza
caselli
zes unica
Mezzogiorno

Zes Unica del Mediterraneo, una sfida per sviluppo e sicurezza dell’area

La Zes Unica del Mediterraneo è stata al centro del dibattito organizzato dall’Istituto Eurispes, che ne ha analizzato i fattori socio-economici, logistici e geopolitici. La Zes Unica diviene strategica in un contesto geopolitico di grandi cambiamenti e incertezze, come strumento utile a garantire sicurezza e sviluppo.
di redazione
zes unica
scuola italiana
Intervista

La Scuola sia baluardo di conoscenza, tolleranza e spirito critico: intervista a Paolo Pagliaro

L’istruzione in Italia è una roccaforte di valori come la conoscenza, il senso critico, la tolleranza, eppure rischia un declino simile a quello della Sanità pubblica. Sfide e opportunità per il futuro della Scuola italiana, nell’intervista a Paolo Pagliaro, Direttore agenzia giornalistica 9Colonne e autore televisivo.
di redazione
scuola italiana
isole
Osservatori

Nascita geologica e nascita giuridica delle isole: intervista a Niki Aloupi

La nascita geologica di un’isola non corrisponde necessariamente alla sua nascita giuridica: lo chiarisce ampiamente Niki Aloupi, docente di Diritto internazionale pubblico all’Università di Parigi- Panthéon-Assas, esperta di Diritto del mare, che offre una panoramica sulla situazione giuridica internazionale delle isole.
di redazione
isole
social
Società

È guerra totale contro la “trappola dei Social”

Le autorità statunitensi hanno cominciato a porsi domande sulla tutela dei minori rispetto all’utilizzo dei Social network. Un uso che, secondo una serie di studi condotti, è relazionato al peggioramento della salute mentale di adolescenti e ragazzi.
di cecilia sgherza
social
apprendimento
Istruzione

La vera inclusione scolastica è garantire buoni livelli di apprendimento per tutti

La Scuola italiana ha bisogno di una riflessione pedagogica e strutturale, e di formulare un’offerta formativa equa basata sull’apprendimento di livello per tutti. Intervista a Roberto Ricci, presidente Invalsi, che commenta i dati emersi dal Secondo Rapporto dell’Eurispes su Scuola e Università.
di Roberto Ricci*
apprendimento